Changes in Bird Names: A Wildlife Photographer’s Perspective

The American Ornithological Society (AOS) recently announced that it will revise English names of bird species named after people or linked to exclusionary history. As a wildlife photographer who spends so much time with these birds, I have followed this debate with interest. The change affects both science and birding, and it brings up real questions for people who care about these species.

The Quest for Inclusivity

One argument for updating names centers on inclusivity. The goal is to remove names that may exclude people or reflect a difficult past. Supporters hope this creates a more welcoming birding community. I understand this idea. Many people come to birds because they enjoy nature and want a place where everyone feels comfortable.

Shifting the Focus to Birds Themselves

As a photographer, my attention has always been on the birds themselves. I focus on their behavior, colors, and the small moments they reveal through the lens. New names could shift conversations back to the birds and away from people from the past. That idea lines up with how I like to photograph wildlife. I want to highlight what makes each species unique.

The Ongoing Debate

The debate around new names is still active. Many birders disagree about which names should change and why. These discussions show how complex the issue is. They also show how many perspectives exist within the community.

Pros and Cons: A Photographer’s Perspective

There are clear pros and cons to consider. Here are a few from my point of view:

Pros:

Inclusivity: More inclusive names can help the community feel more open to everyone.

Focus on Birds: Updated names can place attention on the species instead of the people they were named after. This may encourage people to look more closely at the birds themselves.

Accuracy: Removing offensive or unclear common names can support better communication for beginners and experts.

Cons:

Loss of Familiarity: Many birders have strong memories tied to old names. Changing them can feel like losing part of the hobby.

Disagreement: Not everyone agrees on what counts as an inappropriate or outdated name. This can create confusion and inconsistency.

Cost: Field guides, websites, and scientific materials will need updates. That work takes time and money.

I view this change with an open mind. The effort aims to make birding more inclusive and more accurate. Some people will welcome it. Others will find it challenging. Either way, the discussion shows how much passion people have for birds.

In the end, the birds remain the same. Their beauty and behavior continue to inspire me every time I raise my camera.